Communication Style Paper

AA Professor Course 6315 Feb 26, 2013 intercourse STYLES ANALYSIS OF THE INTERACTION This paper analyzes a specific interaction. The purpose is to see how changing the intercourse trend according to the subjects multiform force out contrive divergent outcomes. The topics cover in this paper are (1) playing fields Involved, (2) The particular interaction and Analysis, and (3) Conclusion. Subjects Involved The nature of the two subjects involved in the study makes the psychoanalysis interesting due to their opposite confabulation carriages. Any miscommunication between the two can result in undesired outcomes.The side by side(p) paragraphs describe the two subjects and their communication styles followed by the discussion of the particular interaction and its analysis. Subject 1 The Candidate Sales director The one thing that separates the Sales Manager, Brian, from everyone else in the office is his desire to be like by everyone. Brian cannot handle rejection of any kind. He is the person to approve any changes in Sales recommendations to the investors. Convincing Brian to do anything separate than what he wants is quite a task. all(prenominal) time one is almost to lead Brian, something magically appears that takes him away to a different task.Subject II The Noble Me I am the second subject. Being a Noble, acquire into long discussions over rather serial forward issues is difficult for me. Arguments are charming simple for me. The solution is either this or that. I have a necessitate to make a decision and buy the farm on to the next task with the least(prenominal) amount of time wasted. The Specific Interaction and Analysis Brian has been the Sales Manager for the support five years. The office environment is on the fence(p) and democratic. All important issues are discussed in weekly friday morning meetings.Agendas for monday morning sales meetings are finalized on friday along with the recommendations for different coronation properties to be saveed to the investors the following week. In the weekly discussions, Brians job is to list to the recommendations of the Sales Team which is led by me. Every time, when we need to finalize the recommendation, the discussions besot heated and Brian just changes the topic and starts discussing something else. for each one week, we end up with an argument nerve-racking to convince each other of the investment pick of the week, without coming to an agreement.Every argument leads to Brian discussing a completely different topic. It became a documentary problem for the sales team, as we left-hand(a) the meeting without a do judgement of to present to our investors in the coming week. one time I understood Brians communication style, I discussed our course of action with my team. chthonic no circumstances were we to start an argument. Our regulate of voice was to remain calm and in control at all times. We offered our views as an alternative without trying t o direct or control him. The discussions were longer than what I would have liked but the results were ncouraging. After weeks of unclear outcomes, we were able to come up with clear investment recommendations for our sales team to present to our investors. Conclusion I learned that knowing the other persons style of communication makes the communication process a little easier. I always knew about the differences among people but never gave it the require thought to help me communicate better. I now alter my communication style depending upon the person I am transaction with resulting in more effective communication.