Animal cloning for human consumption

Although the products of ringerd animals and their progeny will most likely be meritless for human consumption, we would like to see more comprehensive studies, specifically designed to examine food galosh? Dr. Margargont Mellon, Director of UCS?s food & environment program. ?If consumers aren?t going to be told if their meat is from a cl wiz, FDA has to be certain the meat is safe.?The preventive of eating meat and drinking mile from cloned animals is far from proven, with moreover a handful of studies, and no long term identify of any problems. According to the FDA a clone is a familial copy of an animal. They are similar to identical twins, but in effect(p) born at different times. Cloning should be fount of as an extension of the assisted reproductive technologies that livestock breeders tin been using for centuries?such as artificial insemination, and more slow in vitro fertilization. They also are proud to state that clone the animals poses no risks to th eir health as compared to other reproductive methods including native mating. The composition of the food product is no different than those derived from conventionally bred animals. These facts come from the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) who also materialize to be the FDA?s veterinarian spokespeople.

So are these facts true, or are the people behind them being paid to entertain what the public wants to hear?While looking on the FDA?s webpage I came across a ?Myth? section. One of which says that the when the clones are born, they are the same age and size as their extend thinor, and don?t live long afterwards. The FDA says th at this is a invention and that they are pe! rfectly healthy and are in no focusing oversized, or anything buy a calf. Strangely this website was the one of the only of... If you want to get a full essay, rescript it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay